phone in SOS mode still, c'mon #verizon

TOTAL90 v. Nike: What's up next?

The parties have to write a memo explaining their positions as to what type of use constitutes use in commerce and how much use constitutes continuous use under the Lanham Act as applied to this case by Jan. 20th.

Nike claims TOTAL90's trademark registrations contained materially omissions and false statements. In the declarations submitted with their application, TOTAL90 represented under penalty of perjury that they were entitled to use the mark, had a bona fide intention to use the mark

Nike says TOTAL90 send letters and were in contact with them to sell Nike their trademark. They offered $2.85 million and then $2.5 before initiating this litigation.